Αγαπητέ ellovos το πρώτο της Κίνας το έχουμε αναφέρει και πιό πριν.
Κάποιοι έχουν αναλύσει το βίντεο καρέ-καρέ, ιδίως την στιγμή που εξαφανίζεται.
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/6816/cn2to5.jpg
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3122/cn1gh9.jpg

Και στις 2 φωτογραφίες θα δεις την ίδια καταγραφή 17:23 δηλ έχουμε δύο διαφορετικές εικόνες για το ίδιο λεπτό (ανάβει τις μηχανές; και εξαφανίζεται) χωρίς κίνηση της μηχανής.

Δες και αυτήν την λούπα που έφτιαξε ένα άλλο παιδί
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/5816/chinaufoan5.gif

Σχετικά με το ufo crash μάλλον πρόκειται για πειραματικό σκάφος που δεν τα κατάφερε.Στο βίντεο των πύργων, δεν καταλαβαίνω ακριβώς τι
βλέπω και αν τα αντικείμενα που δείχνει έχουν σχέση μεταξύ τους. Πάντως φαίνεται σαν κάτι να περνάει κάτω/δίπλα από το ελικόπτερο. Το τελευταίο, μάλλον μου θυμίζει μαχητικό.

Oannhsea, είπαμε οι γερμανοί του 40 έκαναν τεράστια δουλειά στα χαρτιά. Χωρίς αυτούς αμφιβάλλω αν θα είχαμε φτάσει στην σημερινή αεροπορική εξέλιξη.

Πάντως και για τα φώτα που είχα γράψει πιό πριν

quote:

---

Ο συνταξιούχος συνταγματάρχης της Αεροπορίας, τράβηξε πρόσφατα μία φωτογραφία με κάτι περίεργα φώτα, πάνω από το σπίτι του στο Αρκάνσας.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53841

---

'We are either alone in the universe or we are not. Both ideas are overwhelming'
-Arthur C. Clarke-

quote:

---

ΑΝ ΚΑΝΕΙ
ΤΕΤΟΙΕΣ ΕΜΦΑΝΙΣΕΙΣ ΘΑ ΠΑΨΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΥΣΤΙΚΟ.

---

Συμφωνώ απόλυτα με τον φίλο Open Mind. και στις δύο απαντήσεις του.

Η ιδέα του αερόστατου απορρίπτεται καθώς και οτιδήποτε μπαλόνι. αλλά...
Δεν βλέπω όμως κανείς να δείχνει ενδιαφέρων.
Να υποθέσω λόγο του ότι δεν μπορεί να αμφισβητηθεί η φωτογραφία;

Η αμφιβολία είναι η αρχή της σοφίας!

παίδες,
το τρίτο βίντεο είναι από διαφημιστικό κλιπακι του ιδιωτικού καναλιού SCIFI (αυτό που παίζει το Gallactika etc.)Ο τίτλος της διαφήμησης ήταν SciFi Happens. (Κατά το πολύ εύλογο αμερικάνικο **** happens).

Και εδώ ανακαλύπτουμε πως το εσωτέρικα έχει censorer στα αγγλικά γιατί αντικατέστησε την παραπάνω λέξη με αστερισκους

Άμα βρείτε το βίντεο σε υψηλή ανάλυση θα πάθετε πλάκα πόσο αληθινό φαίνεται. Ούτε ταινία του Χόλυγουντ...

Το βίντεο υπήρχε στην επίσημη ιστοσελίδα του καναλιού στο παρακάκω λινκ, το οποίο τώρα είναι νεκρό

http://www.scifi.com/happens/happens_1_big.mov

Εδώ τα στοιχεία για το κλιπακι...

http://www.rense.com/general41/scihoax.htm

quote:

---

ΤΟ ΠΡΩΤΟ ΒΙΝΤΕΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΔΥΣΚΟΛΟ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΞΗΓΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΑΛΛΑ ΟΥΤΕ ΕΓΩ ΟΠΩΣ ΚΑΙ Ο Krios ΒΛΕΠΩ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΟΝ ΓΙ ΑΥΤΟ AΠ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΕΧΟΝΤΕΣ.

---

Τώρα το κατάλαβες φίλε μου;
Ξέρεις πόσα αξιόλογα πράγματα πέρασαν ασχολίαστα; Γιατί;
Τα γελοία βιντεάκια τα σχολιάζουμε, σπαταλώντας ολόκληρες σελίδες...
Όπως και για τη φώτο που παρέθεσα δεν είδα ενδιαφέρων.
Εκτός από την αγαπητή Ostria που δεν αφήνει κανένα παραπονεμένο.
Πάντως εάν συνεχίσουμε με την ίδια τακτικά, απλά χάνουμε το χρόνο μας....

Η αμφιβολία είναι η αρχή της σοφίας!

Και αφού το θεωρείς συμαντικό, απάντησε στις εξείς ερωτήσεις:
Α) Ποιό είδος θα διάλεγε αυτό τον τρόπο παρακολούθησης. Δεν θα είχε ένα άλλο - γελοίο τρόπο- όπως εμείς τα κατασκοπευτικά σκάφη να το κάνει; Με την νανομποτική δεν χρειάζεται καν το θύμα (εμείς δηλαδή) να δει και να καταλάβει ΤΙ το παρακολουθεί. ΟΧΙ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΑΝΤΑ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΟΟΟΟΟΟΟ... (Γιατί υπάρχουν πάντα και οι άσχετοι με την τεχνολογία.)
Β) Γιατί πάντα πίανουν τα σκάφη σε κάμερες λίιιιιγο πριν εξαφανιστούν ή για δευτερόλεπτα και δεν τα πιάνουν για πολύ χρόνο; Παίζουν το κρυφτό τα ατιμούλικα ε;
Γ) Πως στα κομμάτια κατάλαβε ο δικός σου ότι τον πρακολουθούν - από κάπου- και την έκανε;;;
Δ) Δεν ήξερε ότι πετώντας κοντά σε κατοικίες θα τον δουν; Αλλά είπε "δικέ μου, τα παίζω όλα για να δω μπανιστήρι", και το έπραξε...
Ε) Πόσο σίγουρος είσαι (στην 0,000001% περίπτωση που είναι αληθινό το βίντεο και όχι μούφα) ότι το σκάφος έφυγε και απλώς δεν ενεργοποίησε το σύστημα προκάληψης του. ΚΑΤΙ που οι αμερικανοί το έπραξαν ήδη απότο τέλος του Βππ και ξέρουμε ότι είμαστε ικανοί να το κάνουμε και σήμερα...
Ζ) ΓΙΑΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΓΗΙΝΟ;;; Μήπως γιατί είναι στρογγυλό και το παίζει φαντομάς;;; Πρόσεξες ότι το σχήμα του είναι ΙΠΤΑΜΕΝΗ ΣΤΡΟΓΓΥΛΗ ΠΤΕΡΥΓΑ;;; ΧΡΕΙΑΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΜΩΡΕ ΟΙ ΕΞΩΓΗΙΝΟΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΤΩΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΠΕΤΑΞΟΥΝ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΓΗ ΤΗΝ ΣΤΙΓΜΗ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΕΝΑ ΤΣΟΥΠ ΚΑΙ ΦΕΥΓΟΥΝ;;;
Η) Που εμφανίστηκε το αντικείμενο; Μήπως άκουσα κάτι προς ανατολίτικα;;;

Δεν έχεις προσέξει πως είμαι από αυτούς που λέει πως κάτι τρέχει (και όχι στα γύφτηκα) με τα αγρογλυφηκά. Διάβασε τις πρώτες σελίδες και θα δεις ότι έγραψα για κάποιο Πούνκ...
ΟΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΑ ΕΞΩΓΗΙΝΟ ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ ΕΚΦΡΑΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΥ.
ΟΙ ΓΗΙΝΟΙ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΚΕΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΚΦΡΑΣΕΙΣ.
ΘΕΣ ΝΑ ΤΟ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΙΣ;;;
ΠΑΡΕ ΜΕΡΙΚΑ ΒΙΒΛΙΑ ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ, ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΓΙΝΕΙΣ ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΟΣ, ΘΑ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΙΣ ΟΜΩΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΕΚΦΡΑΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΥΣ.
ΜΗ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΗ ΕΚΦΡΑΣΗ - ΕΞΩΓΗΙΝΟ
ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΗ ΕΚΦΡΑΣΗ (Π.Χ. ΑΡΣΕΝΙΚΟ, ΘΗΛΥΚΟ) - ΓΗΙΝΗ...

http://www.filecabi.net/video/ufoyeahright.html

quote:

---

ΑΡΧΑΙΟ ΜΟΝΤΕΛΟ.

http://www.filecabi.net/video/ufoyeahright.html

---

'We are either alone in the universe or we are not. Both ideas are overwhelming'
-Arthur C. Clarke-

First Photos/Videos/Reports Of Contrail Objects

The "Tracer Project" began in the winter of 1999 with a clear sighting of a star-light then a white oval object above a white billowing persistent contrail (PC) formed by what appeared to be a KC-135 aircraft. (see http://tracers.8m.com/sightingsm.htm). Within a few months of gathering numerous sighting reports and photos/videos in 1999, it became obvious that these elusive objects and their contrail remnant "clouds" were associated with an unusual type of contrail. The objects --usually spherical or oval in shape --had commonalities that could be divided easily into categories according to size, shape, color, behavior and location.

~ While I was documenting and trying to make sense of these spectacular first sightings, a sighting was reported by Matthew Duran of Albuquerque, New Mexico who witnessed a silver ball move within a contrail and hover (see http://earthfiles.com/earth016.html). On March 16 other simialr sightings were reported which included an employee of Peterson AFB in Colorado Springs, Colorado, a woman in Pennsylvania (see http://earthfiles.com/earth017.html and report at above 'original' link).

Later that spring on 5/7/99, Gary Graham of Phoenix, Arizona was trying out his new digital camera photographing PCs and caught a rounded light colored object with two trailing dark ones on one frame (http://earthfiles.com/earth030.html).

~ In May of 2000, Gregory Avery, attorney and State Director of Louisiana MUFON provided Tracers the first excellent videos of PC associated objects. See http://tracers.8m.com/GA.htm and http://tracers.GAvideo.htm for video captures and a description of the full video. Avery's video for the first time shows a PC being laid and zoom video of both large spherical white objects and smaller darker objects which he refers to as "pucks" stationary within the contrail left behind.

While shooting a segment of his video, Avery spotted a bizarre looking object(s) seeming spinning below the spreading contrail. This object(s) was captured on video and appears upon close observation to be several dark objects moving quickly around a lighter colored one -- releasing a dark particulate. White "cloudy" appearing spheres with dark objects "attached" can be seen moving out of this freshly laid persistent contrail, spinning below it and returning into the contrail multiple times. (See Filer's File # 37 for George Filer's observations of Avery's video)

In Avery's video, shortly after the dispersal of the contrail, the PC begins to spread and the darker objects move out of the contrail as do larger white objects with the darker ones attached. This "attachment" or "nudging against" is usually on opposing sides of the white object two or four dark objects affixed opposing one another along the exterior. With very large white objects, there may be more darker objects attached around the perimeter.

Those darker objects independent of the white objects "swarm" beneath the PC and in and out of the nearby clouds -- some hovering and slowly moving within and on the edges of these clouds. This swarming activity takes place at extreme speeds --the objects often reversing directions in a split second at times the objects moving very close to one another. While the white/dark object "combination" objects do move at extreme speeds and join one another in various combinations themselves -- so far these have not been observed in the swarming behavior exhibited by the darker objects.

~ Santiago Yturria of Ovni Investigacions Mexico provided a report to Jeff Rense and Tracers regarding a multiple witness (15+) sighting as they stood in a parking lot in Monterrey, Mexico. A news crew was called to the scene and proceeded to videotape what appeared to the witnesses a dark "morphing" object above them. Aircraft pilots attempting to land were alerted and also reported observing the objects. (See full report at http://www.rense.com/ufo4 /mont.htm)

Enhancements appear to show this "morphing" object to be in actuality four separate objects -- one stationary with three objects moving extremely fast around one another exuding a dark gaseous substance. (See http://tracers.8m.com/PCobjects.htm for enhancements) This low altitude activity witnessed by multiple witnesses in Mexico on September 12, 1999 certainly sounds similar to that witnessed by Greg Avery in Louisiana on May 7, 2000 just eight months later.

A multitude of witnesses have reported seeing clusters of rather large spherical objects appearing to fly together as in a flock or swarm around one another.

On 3-8-01 in Portland, Oregon at about 5:30 p.m. three persons reported witnessing 100 or so golden spheres. "They moved in the way flocks of birds do in relation to each other (though even more so the way embers from a fire slowly waft skyward.) There appeared to be no visible wings, and they made no particular sound, so only nearby traffic could be heard. The orbs sort of drifted, corkscrew-like, up and down the column-like concentration of orbs that hovered around the "center" of the group. The sun was very bright, and not blocked, and the rays fully hit the spheres, making it hard to discern what they actually were. The sun made the cloud behind the orbs particularly dark and smokey-looking, and one could not see through it. This event lasted about 10 minutes, until all the orbs had drifted into cloud cover, and as cloud cover moved over them."

~ In his photographs taken in the Pacific Northwest in May 2000, Michael Bonniker also captured a snapshot of similar looking objects. These darker objects (17 in all) appear simultaneously at various levels in his photograph -- ranging from ground level near evergreen trees to higher altitudes in front of large banks of clouds. The darker objects appear to be dark brown in color having an amorphous shell surrounding them -- the shape varying from spheroidal to oval during their flight--thus appearing almost identical to the darker objects captured in Avery's video. (see http://tracers.8m.com/bonn17.htm for Bonnicker's dark objects and http://www.rense.com/1.imagesa/pucks.htm for Avery's video captures of similar dark objects).

Recently, Tracers acquired excellent video from Doug McGinnis taken on June 6, 2001 over Westpoint, Texas. This video clearly shows contrails containing both the white and dark objects. This clearest video yet reveals zoomed close-ups of a white spherical object with darker objects attached -- and multiple objects maneuvering across the sky at beyond lightning speeds.

McGinnis' video (still being analyzed) seems to illustrate the agility and speed at which these objects can fly. The objects performance capabilities include: hovering, slow travel accelerating to extreme speeds (an estimated 15-20K per second), quick reversals in direction seeming "lighter than air", swooping to low altitude over a house and back up to contrails all in under a second in time -- wildly surpassing any publicly-known human aerial vehicle or UAV. (See http://tracers.8m.com/pcobjects.htm)

~ Rick Moors of Santa Monica, California has provided Tracers with many extraordinary photographs of PCs and what appears to be the release of hundreds of objects -- illustrating for the first time a particular kind of dispersal pattern. Upon enlargement and detailed study of many of Moors' photographs, it became apparent that the darker objects line the outer edges of some persistent contrails--with larger white spherical objects occupying the interior. (See http://tracers.8m.com/RMphotos.htm and http://tracers.8m.com/contcnt.htm)

Also apparent in Moor's photos is the strange white substance contained within the PC -- surrounding the objects. Witness observation, photos and videos all document that as objects move from a persistent contrail, often they 'drag' a white flowing substance with them. These same remnants from the PC often form the strange white smooth flowing and wisping "clouds" we have witnessed in our skies over the last few years.

This movement of objects out of PCs could also account for the "bi-directional" flows of the contrail substance from the originally laid contrail. (see http://rense.com/general11/chem.htm and http://tracers.8m.com/contrails.htm for examples)

Mystery Objects: Human Manufactured Robots ?

It would appear we have only two options as to the source of PCs and their cohort objects. Either we are witnessing at the remnants of back-engineering of ET camouflage and/or UFO propulsion or a massive human robotic release into the atmosphere covering the entire planet.

Materials for the upper air distribution or creation of robotic devices, advanced energy sources, mass communications, coolants, camouflage, radar jamming or all of these in combination might produce by-products or 'waste' in the atmosphere....which may account for the "white haze" and "angel hair" falls and other strange atmospheric changes witnessed by PC observers.

Perhaps we should look (albeit superficially at publicly released levels) at what is being researched and developed at universities with government/defense department support. It is conceivable that human R&D projects have produced antigravity devices with electromagnetic properties driven by superconductivity and fashioned out of extremely cheap, light weight and close to fluid materials. Centrally core chips may be surrounded by not only needed energy sources but may bond temporarily as needed to other independent robotic hosts consisting of synthetic nanotech components.

With the ability to fly at astronomical speeds, these objects could perform various autonomous tasks from weather, geographical/terrain or human tracking information gathering-- to sensing and enzymatic neutralization of atmospheric toxins and biological /chemical weaponry.

I - Aerial Robotics

According to Intelligent Automation Inc. (IAI): "[D]uring November and December 1999, IAI was awarded $3 million dollars in new multi-year research contracts from DOD and NASA. These projects over a wide range of technology and enable us to continue along our established research paths in such areas as fuzzy logic based low power consumption, noise elimination, intelligent agent infrastructure development, robotics, system health monitoring and time modulated ultra-wideband radar."

While very little is mentioned about the capabilities of aerial robots at many universities -- other than two to ten foot drones and UAVs (aircraft and helicopter styles) that can only travel at 40 mph for 40 minutes -- there is talk about the usefullness of aerial and ground units working in unison...in "many robot" tasks and functions.

In "The Examination and Exploration of Algorithms and Complex Behaviour to Realistically Control Multiple Mobile Robots", Duncan Crombie, in his 1997 thesis examines the potential for aerial robots in the military setting:

[http://members.ozemail.com.au/~dcrombie/project/thesis/index.html# ]

"...Of a more serious nature, military applications could include offensive robotic swarms that home in on a target and attack en masse. The approach of a large number of mobile robots or drones could confuse and more easily infiltrate a security or defence system than a single large unit. Also being researched by the US military is the concept of replacing military satellites with 'constellations' of small mobile units[4]. This makes the destruction of the satellite much harder as it could still function with reduced numbers...."

IAI's communications development project 'Communications for Non Line of Sight Applications' "...employs the coordinated control of a swarm of small unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) to serve as nodes in a communications network between a ground station controller and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs). IAI will use an OTS UAV for this project; however, we have designed and built our own micro-UAV (MUAV) and microrovers for other applications."

In addition, "[t]he Navy is testing unmanned mini-submarines at its Space and Naval Warfare Systems Centre in San Diego. It is also developing unmanned hovercraft that resemble fictional 1950s-vintage flying saucers. The flying craft gather intelligence while hovering quietly...." (see http://rense.com/general11/point.htm)

For more information regarding multi-agent robot systems, "flocking" and "swarming" (detection/collision avoidance/communication among groups of robots) AI learning and evolutionary concepts -- see the following sites and references:

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~dcrombie/project/thesis/ (Thesis Re: Flocking & Swarming Behavior) http://www.red3d.com/cwr/boids/applet/ (Applet illustrating "Flocking" maneuvers) http://www.aist.go.jp/NIBH/~b0616/Lab/Links.html (Applets for Neural Networks & Artificial Life) http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/context/42936/32778 (Research In Multi-Agent Systems) http://www.cs.unc.edu/~geom/collide/packages.html (Collision Detection Packages)

A. Wu, A.C. Schultz, and A. Agah. Evolving control for distributed micro air vehicles. In IEEE Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation Engineers Conference, 1999.

The research, theory and mobile robot competitions at college campuses abounds -- but can they fly now...and fly with extreme speed and agility as appears to be exhibited on video and eyewitness reports? The size of the PC objects caught on tape appear to be ranging from 10-20 feet in diameter certainly not the size of MAVs or other micro aerial designs. Do these designers have at present the capability of flying spherical bodies 20 feet in diameter which can hover, attach to other bodies and operate at these extreme speeds?

According to Virginia Young, chief of the concept lab in Alabama's Aviation Missile Research Development and Engineering Centre -- robot functions are still limited by shortcomings in artificial intelligence. For now, systems run by remote control within sight of the operator, or are guided by the operator using the machine's onboard sensors. Truly autonomous robots that think for themselves are at least a decade away.

What are we to believe? Are there no MAVs or aerial robots flying in our atmosphere? Or are there UFO-like robots already deployed with complex sensors to hover and zip over our communities and through our upper atmosphere--collecting enormous bits of information regarding the climate, weather, government and military projects (i.e., over-the-horizon radar, mass communications, bio/chem checks, pollutant decontamination) and the personal lives of US and world denizens?

With what appears to be a limitless speed, agility and energy supply for these "objects" in the sky -- is there human technology that can make this enormous feat possible?

Anti-Gravity & Superconductors

Although there is certainly much research into the area of antigrav Mach8+ high G force flight with anti-detection devices and materials, no evidence as of yet has surfaced that any government, military, corporate entity has mastered the capability of flight exhibiting by these contrail-associated objects.

While little is surfacing on the prospects of black project anti-gravity flight of objects large or small, some discoveries are coming to light as described in the November 2000 issue of IEEE "The Institute". Greg Gillespie reports that a Finnish researcher discovers a gravity-change effect:

"Dr. Eugene Podkletnov, a researcher at the Tampere University of Technology, Finland, reported that during a superconductivity experiment, tests showed a small drop in the weight of objects placed over a device made up of a rotating superconducting ceramic disk suspended over a magnetic field produced by three electric coils enclosed in a cryostat. The latest experiments by the Finnish researchers have reportedly registered a 2 percent drop in the weight of objects suspended over the cryostat..."

(See Superconductors and Gravity research by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center regarding YBCO superconductors and gravity at http://www.inetarena.com/~noetic/pls/Papers/msfcuah1.html and http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/anti_grav_000928.html for the 9/28/00 Space.com article outlining the story of research and development)

Although various energy sources are on the theoreticians tables, at present what flying robots are presented in publicly accessed publications and in Aerial Robot Competitions are fuel powered and propeller driven vehicles. (see http://tracers.8m.com/uav.htm)


II - Advanced Materials Research

New advanced alloys and materials are being researched and developed which exhibit at least some of the aspects of the "mystery objects" possible composition...but do they cover all the components necessary and are they in current usage in aerial flight?

The constituents of PC-related objects would likely be heat-resistant, light-weight, highly flexible, inexpensive materials -- each robot utilizing atmospheric elements and self-produced energy/gases and containing autonomous artificial intelligence MEMs units with numerous sensors/attentuators. [The cost of creating and distributing the propeller gas-powered aerial craft currently being tested have been quoted at approximately $1000 a bot.]

The PC objects witnessed and photographed worldwide appear to be acutely flexible and adaptable to various functions. The white vapor-enveloped core are surrounded by shape-changing darker units which either make use of the white object in some way and/or propel it through the atmosphere. What advanced materials manufactured by humans could accomplish these feats while moving through the atmosphere from 0-hover to 30K feet per second?

The answer might lie with latest greatest science-military-corporate brainchild ...the new generation of polymers...chains of carbon atoms with links with other atoms such as oxygen, silicon, sulphur & phosphorus (most common) some forming cystalline or semi-crystalline solids...other liquids or melts.

Silk-like polymers and new metal alloys are changing our world -- used in the development of everything from exceedingly strong materials for aircraft to semiconductor nanoparticles and superconductors. (For a review of the attributes of polymers see "Building with Snakes - the Physics of Long-Chain Molecules" a lecture by Adrian R. Rennie) Silk-like synthetic polymers may be connected to the substance within persistent contrails and falling "Angel Hair". See more about "Angel Hair" and its potential connections with UFOs and persistent contrails at http://tracers.8m.com/AHair.htm)

Bioactive polymers will be used as biological sensors-- sensing physical functions and blood levels of pharmaceuticals. Electroactive polymers that can "move" upon electrical stimulation can be used one day to replace damaged muscles and in the meantime used as windshield wipers on a Mars-bound robot. Optoelectric polymers are now used to create thin film transistors, electro luminescent flat panel displays and chemical sensors.

Of particular interest to materials researchers are smart materials, especially shape memory alloys, and their application to the construction of robots...Research on shape memory alloys has produced melt-grown single crystal shape memory rods of Cu-12 to 14% Al-3 to 4% Ni, about 1/8 inch diameter and one foot long demonstrating "step-like" behavior. Some exhibit heat-based movements -- contracting with heat and expanding with cool temperatures.

The memory rods are also superelastic and they have a reactive stress of up to 400 MPa. They are being used as actuators, thermosensitive elements, superelastic hinges, flexible electrical contacts and probes, and antennae. Specifically, researchers have made robot arms with finger grippers with four degrees of freedom, a robotic "pipecrawler", a thermosensor for channel blocking in response to a fire...and other exceptionally flexible and responsive materials. (for general information about shape memory alloys (SMAs). (See http://www.u-net.com/epr/electron/issue2/feat0401.htm for information about Shape Memory Alloys)

Ongoing research at major universities at universities in the US and overseas continues regarding electrically controlled tunable holographic filters using photorefractive lithium niobate and barium titanate. These can be used in fiber optics, for tunable semiconductor lasers and as monochromic light sources. Barium titinate is also at the core of visual units of newly developed robotics.

Without any features of conventional aerodynamic flight and sweeping away the problems of material heating and drag of bluff spherical or oval shaped objects, what is keeping these 'magic machines' aloft and together?

While strong, light-weight and flexible materials are being created -- are these the substance of the PC objects? To solve this mystery, more evidence from persistent contrails, falling remnants and even the object themselves which can be realistically connected to specific contrails will be necessary to show a link to advanced materials created in private and public laboratories around the globe.


And What If These Contrail Objects Are Beyond Our Current Technology?

If these objects are not made by human hands -- which is a possibility -- we will have to look much further and deeper into the activities of these "mystery objects" and consider their potential function in our atmosphere. Based upon observations and information gathered from photographs and videos, they seen to be performing a variety of functions which suggest weather control, atmos-forming and cloaking of larger objects.

Perhaps these objects (for lack of a more definitive description) have always been here as an undiscovered part of our planet and are now using contrails as a novel form of transportation?

Research has just begun in attempting to identify and track not only specific types of persistent contrails and unusual contrail patterns, but to gather data from observations, high altitude photos/videos and satellite images of these particular object's activity. It is believed that with diligence, these objects could be systematically observed visually and digitally and tracked.

If what we are attempting to research is not human made technology... then we are dealing with a unexplained terrestrial environmental event/entity/species, an extraterrestrial entity or object or an "event" that has yet to be discovered or revealed by current science. Obviously, this presents multiple problems for those attempting to observe and gather physical or photographic evidence. (see MUFON Director John Scheussler's "Detection & Identification Of UFOs Using Existing Technology" at http://www.rense.com/ufo6/idufos.htm)

Yet if researchers are attempting to uncover a physical entity or ethereal form beyond current technology or scientific understanding is this research expected to conform to current scientific method, tests and measurements which likely are incapable of measuring superior and advanced technology or lifeforms?

It certainly appears that UFO researchers are called to incorporate the designs of social science, apply the most appropriate scientific methodology while expanding the intuitive and interactive aspects of understanding. Perhaps a new science which includes astro, exo and crypto biological, social, behavioral and interactive components in addition to technological knowledge is in order.

Contact with either undiscovered life forms indigenous to this planet or extraterrestrial life is not only profound in the realm of scientific discovery it is a profound human awakening to and interaction with the unknown. Because of the very nature of this type of research -- researchers from a variety of perspectives looking at the persistent contrail phenomena -- may be required to move beyond the constraints of human systems and scientific approaches forging new pathways of understanding this phenomena... if its origin remain unexplained by human research and development.

Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington, DC February 13, 1998
(Phone: 202/358-1547)

Mary Hardin
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
(Phone: 818/354-0344)

RELEASE: 98-30

VOYAGER 1 NOW MOST DISTANT HUMAN-MADE OBJECT IN SPACE

In a dark, cold, vacant neighborhood near the very edge of
our Solar System, the Voyager 1 spacecraft is set to break another
record and become the explorer that has traveled farthest from home.

At approximately 5:10 p.m. EST on Feb. 17, 1998, Voyager 1,
launched more than two decades ago, will cruise beyond the
Pioneer 10 spacecraft and become the most distant human-created
object in space, at 6.5 billion miles (10.4 billion kilometers)
from Earth. The two are headed in almost opposite directions away
from the Sun.

"For 25 years, the Pioneer 10 spacecraft led the way,
pressing the frontiers of exploration, and now the baton is being
passed from Pioneer 10 to Voyager 1 to continue exploring where no
one has gone before," said Dr. Edward C. Stone, Voyager project
scientist and Director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL),
Pasadena, CA.

"At almost 70 times farther from the Sun than the Earth,
Voyager 1 is at the very edge of the Solar System. The Sun there
is only 1/5,000th as bright as here on Earth, so it is extremely
cold, and there is very little solar energy to keep the spacecraft
warm or to provide electrical power. The reason we can continue
to operate at such great distances from the Sun is because we have
radioisotope thermal electric generators (RTGs) on the spacecraft
that create electricity and keep the spacecraft operating," Stone
said. "The fact that the spacecraft is still returning data is a
remarkable technical achievement."

Voyager 1 was launched from Cape Canaveral on Sept. 5,
1977. The spacecraft encountered Jupiter on March 5, 1979, and
Saturn on Nov. 12, 1980.

Then, because its trajectory was designed to fly close to
Saturn's large moon Titan, Voyager 1's path was bent northward by
Saturn's gravity, sending the spacecraft out of the ecliptic plane
-- the plane in which all the planets except Pluto orbit the Sun.

Launched on March 2, 1972, the Pioneer 10 mission
officially ended on March 31, 1997. However, NASA's Ames Research
Center, Moffett Field, CA, intermittently receives science data
from Pioneer as part of a training program for flight controllers
of the Lunar Prospector spacecraft now orbiting the Moon.

"The Voyager mission today presents an unequalled
technical challenge. The spacecraft are now so far from home that
it takes nine hours and 36 minutes for a radio signal traveling at
the speed of light to reach Earth," said Ed B. Massey, project
manager for the Voyager Interstellar Mission at JPL. "That
signal, produced by a 20 watt radio transmitter, is so faint that
the amount of power reaching our antennas is 20 billion times
smaller than the power of a digital watch battery."

Having completed their planetary explorations, Voyager 1
and its twin, Voyager 2, are studying the environment of space in
the outer Solar System. Although beyond the orbits of all the
planets, the spacecraft still are well within the boundary of the
Sun's magnetic field, called the heliosphere. Science instruments
on both spacecraft sense signals that scientists believe are
coming from the outermost edge of the heliosphere, known as the
heliopause.

The heliosphere results from the Sun's emitting a steady
flow of electrically charged particles called the solar wind. As
the solar wind expands supersonically into space in all
directions, it creates a magnetized bubble -- the heliosphere --
around the Sun. Eventually, the solar wind encounters the
electrically charged particles and magnetic field in the
interstellar gas. In this zone the solar wind abruptly slows down
from supersonic to subsonic speed, creating a termination shock.
Before the spacecraft travel beyond the heliopause into
interstellar space, they will pass through this termination shock.

"The data coming back from Voyager now suggest that we
may pass through the termination shock in the next three to five
years," Stone said. "If that's the case, then one would expect
that within 10 years or so we would actually be very close to
penetrating the heliopause itself and entering into interstellar
space for the first time."

Reaching the termination shock and heliopause will be
major milestones for the mission because no spacecraft have been
there before and the Voyagers will gather the first direct
evidence of their structure. Encountering the termination shock
and heliopause has been a long-sought goal for many space
physicists, and exactly where these two boundaries are located and
what they are like still remains a mystery.

Science data are returned to Earth in real-time to the 34-
meter Deep Space Network antennas located in California, Australia
and Spain. Both spacecraft have enough electricity and attitude
control propellant to continue operating until about 2020, when
electrical power produced by the RTGs will no longer support
science instrument operation. At that time, Voyager 1 will be
almost 150 times farther from the Sun than the Earth -- almost 14
billion miles (more than 20 billion kilometers) away.

On Feb. 17, Voyager 1 will be departing the Solar System
at a speed of 39,000 miles per hour (17.4 kilometers per second ).
At the same time, Voyager 2 will be 5.1 billion miles (8.1 billion
kilometers) from Earth and is departing the Solar System at a
speed of 35,000 miles per hour (15.9 kilometers per second).

JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology,
manages the Voyager Interstellar Mission for NASA's Office of
Space Science, Washington, DC.

quote:

---

el.elyon,
Πριν από λίγες σελίδες προσπάθησα να βάλω στο θέμα τον παράγοντα ψυχολογία και πως επιρεάζει αυτός την θεματολογία των ΑΤΙΑ. Δεν μπόρεσαν να το καταλάβουν όλοι.
Για να δούμε μπορείς εσύ;;;

---

quote:

---

Φίλε μου el.elyon, εγώ δεν θεωρώ των εαυτό μου θρήσκο, και όμως πιστεύω στην ύπαρξή εξωγήινων, να πω ότι δεν είμαι εγωιστής; θα πω ψέματα... αλλά θεωρώ ότι δεν αποτελούμε μοναδικότητα στο σύμπαν. Που κολλάει τώρα η θρησκεία δεν μπορώ ειλικρινά να καταλάβω...
Αν έσφαλα πάλη και άλλο εννοούσες, παρακαλώ διόρθωσε με...
Φιλικά...

Η αμφιβολία είναι η αρχή της σοφίας!

---

ESOTERICA.gr Forums !

© 2010-11 ESOTERICA.gr